0
1
0
0
0
Halloween II (1981)
-
Showtimes
-
Movie Details
We didn't find this title in your area
Videos & Photos
- Trailer 2 for Halloween II (02:19)
Movie Info & Cast
Synopsis
While Dr. Loomis hunts for Michael Myers, a traumatized Laurie is rushed to Haddonfield Memorial Hospital, and The Shape is not far behind her.
Cast
- Jamie Lee Curtis
- Donald Pleasence
- Charles Cyphers
- Jeffrey Kramer
- Lance Guest
- Pamela Susan Shoop
- Hunter von Leer
- Dick Warlock
- Leo Rossi
- Gloria Gifford
Letterboxd User Reviews
3.2
335.8K
103.6K
71.0K
- Oct 31, 2013
Michael Myers is said to be 21 by Dr. Loomis in the film, but then in the credits there is a credit for a 23 year old Michael Myers. I find this confusing, but also depressing. I find it depressing because whether he is 21 or 23 I am still older than Michael Myers, and he…
FilmApeOct 17, 2019Dr. Loomis you are so bad at your job
Patrick WillemsOct 30, 2020mm yeah lemme suck on dem michael myers fingers
adambolt - Oct 2, 2021
would be so embarrassing to be murdered by michael myers when he walks around at a snail’s pace and wheezes with every step he takes
emmaOct 19, 2019michael myers: everyone else: twitter.com/letterboxdlucy/status/1185812099546669056?s=21
LucyOct 4, 2018michael myers is a 21 year old virgin in this
👽 Zara 👽 - Oct 28, 2014
The production of HALLOWEEN II ran way behind schedule and over budget because they shot it six times!
lairdOct 31, 2015Had they not all been brutally slaughtered, the staff at Haddonfield Memorial would've been fired on Nov. 1.
Jacob KnightLoomis: *shoots Michael 7 times* Also Loomis: I sHot HiM SIx TimES
Wahltart Whit
Queue Community Reviews
91%
Community 11,367
Top Reviews
- Andrikk0s likedHalloween II
If anyone knows where I can find a cool edit with the kid getting hit by the car and then burn, would be appreciated🙏
Kayla is "meh" onHalloween IIIt was ok, didn’t get as bored as I did with the first movie
Ava H dislikedHalloween IIBoring.
- Hayden C lovedHalloween II
Best horror movie sequel in my opinion. Also my favorite movie from the franchise, mostly because I like the kills more in this one. This movie continues right after the events of the other one so I recommend watching the first one first. Great movie, 10/10
Arsal likedHalloween IIContinues the night with brutal kills and a haunting hospital setting. It’s grittier and colder, but it still works. Not as sharp as the original, but a solid, bloody follow-up.
Tatycomendo is "meh" onHalloween II- Michael tá mais ativo nesse - As mortes foram um pouco melhores - A música continua muito boa - O menino escorregando no sangue e ficando deitado ???? - O plot da Laurie ser irmã do Michael foi legal - A cena do primeiro se repetindo, a Laurie batendo desesperadamente na porta enquanto o fdp…
- Charlie Mills likedHalloween II
A decent sequel, the hospital setting could of been better and used better techniques for Michael. Not as good as the original. Soundtrack wasn’t as good. More like a cartoonish feel to the theme of Halloween which was a bit odd. Skipping the next one and going on to 4 6.5/10
Landon C lovedHalloween IIA Great movie. Ups the last one easily. I loved the reveal that Lori Strode and Michale where Related and it gave a great motive unlike the Blum House Trilogy. We see more brutal kills the first one because of the bigger budget. Also it picks up right after the first one. 10/10
Matthew Lillards No.1 Fan likedHalloween IIA good sequel, but not quite a great one. The new characters are pretty weak, the pacing feels very stereotypical for a slasher, and it honestly doesn’t even need to exist, but it still has its merits. Good kills, great cinematography, and a fantastic score make it pretty fun.
Atom User Reviews
Metacritic
When it's good, it's because it's imitating its predecessor (but it suffers from tired spilled blood) and when it's bad, it's because it's imitating its own imitators. [31 Oct 1981]
Jay Scott
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
For the most part, Halloween II is a retread of “Halloween” without that movie's craft, exquisite timing, and thorough understanding of horror.
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
There's some variety to the crimes, as there is to the characters, and an audience is likely to do more screaming at suspenseful moments than at scary ones. The gore, while very explicit and gruesome, won't make you feel as if you're watching major surgery. The direction and camera work are quite competent, and the actors don't look like amateurs.
Janet Maslin
The New York Times
Full Screen Image Viewer
Target Exclusive Showing
Don't Have The Password?