Atom User Reviews for Wolf Man
The most stupid attempt of a werewolf movie, the wolfman, looked like a zombie with Botox and rabies. Low budget.
It left too much to the imagination. I left with so many unanswered questions. Not well written. The characters lacked lusters. Too many unnecessary long scenes. Wolfman looked like a mix of an ape from planet of the apes and zombies, I never saw a wolf. I’m annoyed that I paid to see it. It’s stream at home worthy but not big screen worthy.
Great take on Wolf Man!
too long exposition too little wolf man. weak delivery of wolf man’s father and the main actor was lack luster
The story was to short, and some parts it was slow.
A horror filled delight. I enjoyed the simplicity of the story, as didn’t need any further complexity. It was a film filled with suspense as the lines between man and beast were blurred.
Was just okay. Didn’t like the way the wolf man looked. Story was boring.
This movie was suspenseful, full of emotion and at every turn there was a feeling of surprise that kept you diving more into the setting.
Very dull, pretty scenery.
THIS MOVIE IS REALLY GOOD. LOVE WE GET THE SEE THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE WOLF.
Although I think Julia Garner is a much better actress than this movie was. I did enjoy it more than expected.
Metacritic
In one sense, Wolf Man is a generic, and not especially scary, cabin-in-the-woods frightener that leans too often on tenebrous lighting and ear-shredding sound effects. . . Yet the extreme pathos of Blake’s plight is palpable, and Whannell is determined to make us feel it.

Just as Whannell breathed new life into the story of “The Invisible Man” in 2020, he offers a fresh and grotesquely chilling take on the well-trodden storyline of the man who becomes ... something else.

The special effects, when they kick in, are impressive, and the gore hounds in the audience will eventually get their gobbets of flesh, but the messaging of “Wolf Man” is so muddy that it’s not clear what the movie’s trying to say.
